I wish to gain some understanding of the MVP of nonlinear elliptic equation by geometric intuition.

**Linear elliptic equation case**

First of all, I have a very good geometric explain of the MVP of Laplace equation, i.e.

MVP of laplace equation$latex \Delta u=0$ in $latex \Omega$ , $latex \forall B(x_0,r)\subset \Omega$ is a Ball, we have following identity:

$latex \frac{1}{\mu(\partial(B))}\int_{\partial B}u(x)dx=u(x_0)$

I need to point out first, this property is not difficult to proof by standard integral by part method, but the following method have more geometric intuition. And in some sense explain why this property holds.

The proof is not very difficult to explain by mathematic formula, but I wish to divide the proof into two part, explain one part by graph and literal interpretation.

**part 1 of the proof:**

we consider a 1-parameter group of foliation, and consider the integral identity with this foliation.

$latex \int_{v\in S_{n-1}}\int_{\gamma_v} \frac{\partial \partial_{v}u}{\partial t}dt=\int_{B(x_0,r)}\partial_{n}u-\int_{S_{n-1}}\partial_{v}udv=\int_{B(x_0,r)}\partial_{n}u$

**Part 2 of the proof:**

and we have:

$latex \int_{v\in S_{n-1}}\int_{\gamma_v} \frac{\partial \partial_{v}u}{\partial t}dt=0$

by the pointwise equation $latex \Delta u=0$, one key point is $latex \partial_{-v-v}u=\partial_{vv}u, \forall v\in S_{n-1}$.

This approach cloud easily to transform to the general elliptic equation case and it seems a little difficult to transform to Possion equation, the non-hemomorphism case.

**Nonlinear elliptic equation case**

**A-B-P estimate for general nonlinear ****uniformly elliptic equation**

ABP estimate is the most basic estimate in fully nonliear elliptic equation.

The ABP maximum principle states (roughly) that, if

$latex a^{ij} \partial _i \partial _j u \geq f, in \ \Omega \subset \mathbb{R}^n (a^{ij} \geq C Id >0),$

Then (assuming sufficient regularity of the coefficients),

\sup _{\Omega} u \leq \sup _{\partial \Omega} u + C (\int _{\Omega} \vert f \vert^n )^{1/n} ………. (*)

I will give an intuitive explanation of the proof of (*) .

Usually, in order to prove maximum principles, the key idea is to use that at a local max the second derivative is negative-definite, then choose a good basis and get some identity of 1-order drivative and inequality for 2-order’s. This process is used in such like the proof of the Hopf lemma, and some inter gradient estimate, consider some flexiable function like $latex e^{Au}$ or sometihng else anyway.

But in the proof of ABP we need more geometric intution and more trick.

First we do a rescaling:

if $latex a^{ij} \partial _i \partial _j u \geq 1, in B_1 \subset \mathbb{R}^n (a^{ij} \geq C Id >0),u|_{\partial B_1}\geq 0.$

then:

$latex |inf_{B_1}u| \leq C |A|^{1/n} ….(**)$

And then We explain what is the contact set. It is the subset $latex \Gamma^{+} of \Omega$ such that u agree with it convex envelop. i.e. $latex \Gamma^{+}=\{x|u=convex \ evolap \ of \ u\ at \ x\}$ . The geometric meaning is it has at least one lower support plane. So what is $latex \Gamma^{+}$ it is just the set that u is very low on it. Or in another way of view you consider $latex -u$ as a lot of mountains then $latex \Gamma^+$ is the place near the tops of which mountain can see every thing (locally).

Then we look at every point in $latex \Gamma^{+}$ , then determination of the hessian matrix $latex det(u_{ij})$ at this point have a control due to the PDE $latex a^{ij} \partial _i \partial _j u \geq 1$, and the uniformly elliptic property.

The determination of hessian matrix could be view as a determination of Jacobe matrix of the map $latex (u_1,…,u_n)\to (e_1,…,e_n)$ .and by Area formula we have:

$latex \int_{\Phi(\Omega)} f( \Phi^{-1}(y)) dy =\int_{\Omega}f(x)|J({\Phi(x)})| dx,$

It is easy to see for a constant $latex c$ ,$latex B_{c|sup_{\Omega}|u||}(0)\subset \Phi(\Omega)$ (Base on the PDE on every point, the geometric intution is just the function u could not be very narrow cone at every point). So we have , take $latex f=\chi_{\Gamma^{+}}$ ,

$latex |B_{c\sup_{\Omega}|u|}(0)|^{n}\leq \int_{\Gamma^{+}}\chi_{\Gamma_{+}}(x)|J_{\Phi}(x)|dx$

so we have:

$latex |B_{c\sup_{\Omega}|u|}(0)|\lesssim |{\Gamma_{+}}|^{\frac{1}{n}}…(***)$

and the classical matrix inequality for every positive definite matrix A we have

:

$latex det(AB)\leq (\frac{tr(AB)}{n})^n…(****) .$

combine (***),(****) ,we have:

$latex sup_{\Omega}|u|\lesssim ||\frac{a^{ij}u_{ij}}{D^*}||_{L^n({\Gamma^+})} .$

graph

**General approach to get MVP for elliptic equation which is come from geometry**

**MVP for K-hessian equation, with geometric explanation**

** MVP for K-curvature equation, with geometric explanation **

**MVP for p-Laplace equation, with geometric explanation**